None of that as anything to do with the fact that you said lane splitting in California was not legal. Whoever causes an accident is always liable, whether they are riding a motorcycle, car, a bicycle, or a horse.
And here again you demonstrate lack of understand about how laws come to exist. LEOs don't write laws. If it is not unlawful, they cannot write you a ticket for it, so it's not "just goodwill". They can only enforce the laws that are on the book. Go back and click on the link I provided to the CHP web page and read it again.
If you don't want to lane split for whatever reason, don't do it. But stop trying to tell everyone that it "is illegal", "is only tolerated", etc. in California because that it just plain misinformation.
You just don't know what part to grab.
Once again. If lane splitting in the State of California were legal, then the guy riding the motorcycle would not be liable for being in the wrong place at the wrong time going between two rows of cars.
The law would find the driver of a car, a truck, a horse carriage, etc,guilty for causing the accident, for bumping into the rider, hitting the motorbike from behind, from the side,etc. It would mean that the rider of a motorcycle had the legal right to be where he was -splitting lanes- at the time of the accident. But he didn't have that right because splitting lanes is not legal. It's just tolerated. They say that the riders doing that they do it at their own risk.
That's why a guy splitting lanes is always at fault, and that's because he was not under the protection of the law.
What the CHP website refers to is what I described replying to you original post.
The only time the driver of a car, truck, semi truck, etc, can be punished under the California Law is if he intentionally interfered with the motorbike and therefore causing an accident. That's called intent to cause harm.
You have no idea how many guys in cages flipped me off while riding in the HOV lane between 6-10 am and again between 3-7pm and I didn't know why at the time (a very long time ago)
They had no idea that motorcycles were permitted in the HOV lanes during that time. The reason was that whoever was in charge decided not to use those little signs that read (Motorcycles OK) and saving some dough in the process. True story! And that's the law in California.
If lane splitting was lawful the state would be forced to let the public know about it by posting signs on the freeway. Something like: "Lane Splitting Permitted if Traffic Moves at 35mph or Less". But they haven't done that. The reason? They cant do it because splitting lanes is not legal.
So I don't blame you for not understanding the concept of splitting lanes and dreaming about that something is either lawful or is not. Lane splitting is a perfect example of something that is not written in the law but is perceived as such.
It is a beautiful thing because it's of service to the motorcycle riders community. What a great way to come up with something, that if done right, makes your life a lot easier in a state that holds over 40 million people.
By the way, what state are you calling home?