nielsm
Well-known member
This is exactly the point of why the "only bike" premise of the thread is difficult. While I've taken my GS on single track and sand in locations hundreds of miles from where I live, it is much easier on a light weight dual sport like a KTM 350 or 500 EXC than a 500+ pound adventure bike and the speed thru those sections would be faster on a dirt bike than adventure bike. But on the flip side, I wouldn't want to ride that KTM from my house to get to those dirt spots so far away carrying all my camping gear.It’s all relative. I had a neighbor a few years back who was part of the crew to build the motor cross tracks at the Pontiac Silverdome and Palace of Auburn Hills when the tour would come through Detroit. He’d always have me out to watch construction of the track, then the races. Those guys are absolutely nuts in how they ride. Pure reckless abandon. Flying through the air over massive jumps, then grinding through the washboard section of the course, all at full out speed. My guess would be that those riders would look at adventure riders going through some puddles and call them posers as well! I never knew any riders, but would have to imagine their bodies don’t age very well taking that type of abuse.
Adventure bikes are probably the best "only bike" out there, which is why they are so popular now. They can ride sporty, they can tour and they can do dirt, but they won't be as good as a dedicated bike for each of those. But part of why the Starbucks crowd loves them is they do make a great sport-touring bike even if you never get them dirty (or only rarely).
The great thing about today is most street bikes are amazingly capable and can be many things. It's all a matter of priorities. If I was to only have one bike, it'd be my GSA. But I think the best option is to have several so you can pick the bike that fits the mission and have some variety.