moleculo
Active member
By the way, what state are you calling home?
I live in Los Angeles and have lane split for almost 30 years while commuting during rush hour.
That's why a guy splitting lanes is always at fault, and that's because he was not under the protection of the law.
That's not true at all. How about an illegal lane change? How about a car driving 100MHP who hits a bike that is lane splitting? "Always" is pretty absolute and I can probably come up with 100 scenarios where the biker would not be found at fault. If you ever get into a scrap while lane splitting, do yourself a favor and hire an accident attorney, because you clearly don't understand liability well enough to defend yourself.
Lane splitting is a perfect example of something that is not written in the law but is perceived as such.
It's obvious to me that you have spent too much time in California believing that you can only do what your oppressors tell you that which you can do. Apparently you don't understand the concept that for something to be unlawful, it is required to be documented as such in the vehicle / penal, etc. code. If it's "not written in the law" (as you put it) as unlawful, then it is not.
But since you like living in a fairy world where you can only do what you are told you are allowed, I'll stop bursting your bubble and responding to this nonsense so you can sleep well at night.